Monday, 19 September 2016

Seize Opportunities to Improve Processes

Article extract ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/29066/improve-processes-opportunities

Lean efforts used to be 100-percent directed at the shop floor. What we have seen recently is that lean is moving into non-traditional areas of business. A lot of our recent work has been in maintenance, procurement, distribution, engineering, the office and even the company kitchen.

A friend of mine recently sent me an article about how Starbucks is realizing benefits from lean efforts in its stores. The coffee-shop giant is doing spaghetti charts, videotaping the work effort and working to reduce the time it takes to process an order. If Starbucks can shave 20 to 30 seconds off an order process that takes 1 minute, 45 seconds, that is a 23-percent improvement. Multiply that by 1,000 orders and you have saved nearly seven hours of effort. That’s certainly enough to save overtime, do more with less and spend more time making customers happier.

However, please keep in mind that the goal of lean is never to rush the process and make the quality worse but merely to eliminate the waste.

So many organizations miss the opportunities to improve in almost all aspects of their business. If you can work to shave time here and there through process improvements on menial tasks, the quality of the entire process can improve, since the employee can spend more time on the important tasks at hand, work less overtime (if hourly) or, if salaried, work less hours and be more productive.

We worked with one group that had a fabrication department that received the job packets on the shop floor between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m. when the operation started at 6 a.m. Despite the fact that the orders were printed every day at midnight, the orders sat in queue or on someone’s desk in queue awaiting work for nine-plus hours.

Each day, the company was losing three to four hours of work time due to waiting on paperwork. Although they had work to do and were not idle, with a four-day lead-time, if an order lost nine hours because of paperwork, they were losing 9.4 percent of their time at the front end due to delays. It is no wonder their on-time performance was in the 80-percent range. They were starting off nine hours late just because of paperwork.

I would encourage everyone to review their entire value-stream processes and find areas that are non- traditional to improve the waste. Take off your regular glasses and put on your waste glasses. You will be shocked at the opportunities that you will find.

Secrets to Becoming a World-class PM Facility

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/29221/world-class-pm-facility


A team effort at Cargill’s salt mine leads to reliability excellence.

The primary goal in any industry is maintaining safe, reliable equipment. This involves getting the maximum uptime at the lowest cost of operation and extending the as-designed usable life. The fundamental cornerstone of this proposition is effective lubrication in concert with preventive and predictive maintenance tasks that are carried out in a quality manner.

Performing required lubrication in a proper manner is challenging in even the best conditions, but at Cargill Deicing Technology’s rock salt mine in Cleveland, Ohio, the obstacles were considerable. The mine is 1,800 feet deep and extends approximately 4 miles under Lake Erie. The underground mining operation utilizes a room-and-pillar style of mining, and its business is dependent on Mother Nature, since the primary product is deicing salt used for keeping roadways and sidewalks ice-free.

The mine maintains a fleet of specialized mobile equipment that extracts the salt, which is transported on a conveyor system to the milling operation and then hoisted to the surface for distribution. Diesel-powered mobile equipment is used for the extraction process. These machines are high oil consumers that require 250-hour operational oil changes.


Cargill Deicing Technology’s rock salt mine in Cleveland, Ohio, is 1,800 feet deep and
extends approximately 4 miles under Lake Erie.

The maintenance team made best-practice theories a reality by constructing a world-class, all-inclusive preventive maintenance (PM) facility, which is a unique installation for any underground mine. Considering all the challenges they had to overcome, the employees rose to meet and overcome those problems with very successful results, thanks in large part to having an engaged workforce and proper training.

Old Practices

Approximately 10 years ago, the mining operation performed equipment servicing and PMs where the equipment was parked. All the material was brought to the machines, including filters, oils, drain pans, supplies, etc. Oil was transported in generic cans that were filled at a bulk station. The top of the can and equipment fill point were wiped off to keep dirt out when new oil was added to the machine. Waste oil was collected and poured back into the same cans to be dumped in the bulk waste-oil container, which was sent back to the surface for recycling.


Previously, Cargill performed equipment servicing and preventive maintenance where the
equipment was parked. Oil was transported in generic cans that were filled at a bulk station.

Oil samples were taken, but maintenance personnel didn’t understand the value, since they did not receive any feedback and no actions were generated as a result of the samples. Once the oils were drained, there was an ongoing question of what product should be used for refilling.

Beginning the Improvement Process

With so many issues at the mine needing improvement, the question was where to begin. It was determined that the best starting point would be to develop the knowledge base of the maintenance personnel. Part of this development was to have each mechanic attend a three-day lubrication course, which was conducted onsite. This helped provide the fundamental understanding that every component requiring lubrication needs the correct lubricant applied in the correct manner in the correct amount at the correct time. When these four principles are followed, equipment can last almost indefinitely.


Cargill maintains a fleet of specialized mobile
equipment that extracts salt from the mine.
Of course, acceptance is not always easy when conducting this type of training with long-time employees. About a week after the training, one veteran mechanic requested a lubricant specification book because he believed an incorrect lubricant was being used for an application. This was a major accomplishment. Having a highly seasoned employee requesting clarification meant he not only understood the class, but he also was applying what he had learned. This was a good first step.

Creating a New PM Bay

With a workforce that is engaged, employees execute what they learn when they understand why. Maintenance personnel soon began questioning current practices and believed they could make improvements, such as building a PM bay. Working with a maintenance supervisor, they decided what should be included in this area. They wanted to be able to perform PM inspections and kidney-loop filtration of systems, not just service equipment.

With a plan in mind, the team started assembling the necessary components. A location near the shop was designated as the PM bay area, and construction soon began. Once completed, the PM bay featured all the necessities for oil storage, pumping and filtration. Safety items were added such as an overhead fall-protection restraint system when accessing the top of the equipment.


Salt is loaded onto a conveyor system for transfer to the milling operation, which crushes
and screens the salt into a usable product before transporting it to the surface.

As the PM bay was put into use, employees became proud of their accomplishment. Although it was not much to look at, it was a major upgrade from what they had been doing. Functionally, the PM bay achieved its intended design of supplying clean, filtered oil to the equipment. More importantly, the improvement came from the workforce wanting to be more proficient. This created a culture shift. Performing PMs where the equipment was located became a thing of the past. Everything now came back to the PM bay, and workers performed PMs with greater care, which translated into better equipment availability.

Continuing to Improve

Mining is an ever-moving operation. As the mineral is extracted, the distance from any permanent location increases. Soon, the PM bay became one of those locations getting farther away. Moving equipment to the bay took longer, leaving less actual PM time.

A suggestion was made to move the PM bay closer to the working face, which would mean more time with the equipment. This was a great idea, but it was a monumental task to disassemble the current PM bay and reassemble it in a new location while managing the required day-to-day maintenance activities.

Then a question was asked: “What if the PM bay was portable so it could continually advance with the faces?” This began a quest to find a supplier that could build a rugged, portable lubrication containment for an underground mine.

Employee involvement was critical. The site lubrication team, mechanics and maintenance apprentices who performed the equipment PMs were asked what they would like to see in this portable lubrication containment. Some of the suggestions were:

  • Hose reels on all oil products
  • Hose reels inside but nozzles outside the containment
  • Everything pneumatically operated (no electric pumps)
  • Waste-oil pump to be high volume and discharge into waste-oil container
  • One waste-oil container outside each containment with easy change-out
  • Kidney-loop filtration built in with quick disconnects
  • Filters to include bypass indicators
  • All filters and pumps the same
  • 110-volt receptacles inside and outside
  • Internal lighting
  • A desktop area inside to complete paperwork
  • A fold-down desk area outside for diesel particulate matter (DPM) testing
  • Storage cabinet for additional filters, tools, test equipment, etc.
  • High-volume compressor to clean out radiators
  • Air hose reels in both containments with 100-foot air line
  • An additional tank and pump in each containment for future expansion
  • Runners underneath containment to facilitate easier moving over rough terrain
When the completed drawings were presented to the lubrication team, mechanics and apprentices, they were pleased everything was included and made only a few suggestions for improvements. This core group was truly engaged in the process. They made a difference, and their ideas were put into practice. They now not only had ownership of the lubrication containment but also enthusiasm in how they performed their work.


Combined employee ideas culminated in the creation of a new PM facility, which
featured all the necessities for oil storage, pumping and filtration.

This enthusiasm was contagious, as others started making suggestions on how to improve the PM process. One idea was to have a level concrete pad on which to park the equipment when doing PMs. This would allow for proper oil fill levels and provide safer footing around the equipment.

Another suggestion was to wash the equipment close to the PM bay in order to eliminate travel time. This posed several challenges, since water dissolves salt and keeping the PM area clean was a priority. One individual’s solution was to create a concrete-lined sump to catch all waste water from the washing process for recycling. This used water would be pumped into a containment tank to water roadways for dust control and improve ventilation.

These combined employee ideas culminated into making the PM facility. The entire 40-by-160-foot work area was made of concrete, creating a safer work environment and improving PM quality. However, this was a major undertaking and required a lot of hard work. The concrete had to be lowered underground, transported to the site as a dry mix, mixed onsite, poured and finished by a crew of volunteers from the maintenance team. This illustrated their belief in the project and their commitment to making their ideas become a reality.


A portable kidney-loop filtration unit was designed
to meet the needs of the mining operation.
When mobile equipment is scheduled for a PM, it is now brought to this new facility. The equipment is first washed and moved 80 feet for lubrication servicing. PM inspections are then conducted on the clean equipment. Predictive tasks like oil sampling are performed using proper procedures and sample ports, and exhaust emission testing is completed. All issues that are discovered in the inspections are noted with a follow-up work order to repair or investigate the problem.

New Practices

Two lubrication containments are used in the new PM facility, with one for general oil and one for equipment-specific oils. Dispensing nozzles are labeled and color-coded. Hose reels are used for all oil, grease and compressed air. There is a drop-down work area outside for completing paperwork or holding test equipment. Tanks are identified by name with color-coded labels. This minimizes the chance of filling a tank or dispensing the incorrect product where it does not belong. Each tank also has its own desiccant breather attached. There’s even a flat surface for completing paperwork.

New oil is filtered with 10-micron, Beta-1,000 filters when it is transferred into the storage tanks from sealed 5-gallon cans. The oil is again filtered upon dispensing to ensure the cleanest oil goes into the equipment. All filters are equipped with a go/no-go filter bypass indicator. When the needle is in the green area, the filter is operating. When filters are in the red section, it’s time to stop and change the filter. This condition-based strategy of filter replacement maintains oil cleanliness while maximizing filter life to reduce cost.

Each unit has a waste-oil pump that is plumbed to a 300-gallon waste-oil tank, which is behind the containment for easy replacement. One unit is equipped with a kidney-loop filtration system using the 10-micron, Beta-1,000 filters set up in a series with quick disconnects. Both units have pneumatic grease guns and fire-suppression systems that are sensor-activated.

Lubricant Consolidation

After examining its underground lubrication inventory, which was in excess of 60 different lubricants with several very similar products, the mining operation initiated a consolidation effort. With the assistance of the lubricant provider, the team evaluated each application for correct product specifications and was able to consolidate down to 10 oil products and two grease products for mobile equipment plus an additional six oil products and one grease product to cover all rotating stationary equipment.

A product application sheet for mobile and rotating stationary equipment was then developed. This color-coded, one-page sheet listed all mobile or stationary equipment and identified the product to use in each application. This significantly reduced inventory and cross-contamination while providing a quick reference for application. Without this consolidation effort, it would have been nearly impossible to build a lubrication containment with enough capacity to house all the different oils.

The Importance of Training

Although the mine’s maintenance personnel generally filled the equipment and gearcases, operators would top-off equipment when they performed a preoperational inspection and found a low oil level. Therefore, to make sure anyone adding oil to the equipment understood the consequences of their actions, lubrication training for some equipment operators and storeroom personnel was implemented.

It Takes Time

When attempting to become a world-class PM facility, it’s important to understand that improvements will not be immediate. They cannot be measured on this month’s metrics sheets or even in this quarter’s results. There must be a vision where progress is compared by years.

Failures will not disappear overnight. Those failures are a direct function of current condition over time. Cleaner oil cannot compensate for a worn gear, bearing or pump but may decrease further damage.

Early on, oil analysis may show a multitude of issues where you lose faith in the process. When components are rebuilt or changed, slowly you will see a trend of improvement. This requires determination and discipline to stay on course, especially when it seems easier to abandon the initiative.

Reject the short-term view in favor of a long-term vision. For instance, if a new hydraulic pump with dirty oil can last six months, using clean oil and a long-term strategy may allow the new pump to continue efficient operation for five years, saving the cost and time of nine pump changes.

Upon completing the training, one operator said he didn’t know oil was that important. He had been adding the wrong oil to his transmission. This showed he wanted to do the right thing but just did not understand why.

Storeroom personnel were trained in lubrication practices because they were the first line of defense in ensuring the correct oil was being put into a machine. Before the training, when someone requested oil, storeroom personnel would fill the request. After the training, an oil request was met with the question of where was the oil going to be used. If the oil requested did not match the application, storeroom personnel would explain that was the wrong oil and then provide the correct oil. This was a great start to control cross-contamination and educate employees.

The lubrication training also taught personnel the value of oil analysis and how to take proper samples. The goal was to make the oil analysis information meaningful. Each sample result would be reviewed when the lab report was received by email. Follow-up work orders would be written to address any anomalies. The results would be posted for all personnel to review. The lab would maintain a database on its Website of all current and historical analysis reports by machine number. Every maintenance employee would have the Web address, username and password with access from any work or home computer. This has made a significant improvement.

Measuring Progress

The Cleveland mining operation has invested a considerable amount of time, money and manpower into improving its lubrication standards and developing a world-class PM facility. Was it worth it? The team is effectively trying to measure the impact by determining how many issues were prevented. Within the first month of operation, the identification and documentation of potential problems by craftsmen completing PMs increased 30 percent.

Many of these described initiatives have reduced cost, improved equipment availability and increased productivity. However, while some things can be measured mathematically, others are not as obvious. For example, consider the direct effect an engaged workforce has on the results. Having the most technologically advanced systems will not necessarily gain improvements without a workforce taking ownership and pride in their accomplishments. This highly skilled and engaged workforce knew how to work as a cohesive team to foster successful results.


When mobile equipment is scheduled for a PM,
it is brought to the new PM facility, where it is
first washed and then moved 80 feet for lubrication
servicing. PM inspections are then conducted
on the clean equipment

The old adage that grease is grease and oil is oil may have worked 50 years ago but no longer applies. Personnel must develop a healthy respect for the complexities involved with proper lubrication practices. The basics of workforce development can be achieved through education and training, while the willingness to execute will be anchored in engagement.

The Cleveland mine has taken a significant step in maintaining its mobile equipment fleet in the safest, most reliable condition with the development, construction and implementation of a world-class PM facility. This was a tremendous team effort in the quest for reliability excellence.

Help Employees Get the Most from Their Career and Life

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/29061/help-employees-career

While giving an update on the successes of a maintenance leadership mentoring program that was celebrating its ninth anniversary, I was told that the program caused four employees to leave the company. This challenge involved two important issues that should be shared at this time of industry turmoil and the possible need for employees to find new jobs.

The first issue relates to the company’s sponsored program. It was designed to fast-track bright potential candidates to be in positions to replace retiring maintenance managers. Over the first eight years, the two-year program with about 80 graduates recorded more than 120 protégé promotions. Not only were the protégés promoted, but the mentors were promoted. Both groups had grown personally, professionally and organizationally. However, the company’s value received was minor compared to the participants’ value received.

One protégé confided that he was not really interested in a promotion and was concerned that he would be asked to leave. I addressed this by saying: “This program is designed to help the individual achieve his or her potential in life. That life includes family, community, work, education/learning and spiritual growth. We cannot focus on the promotion. You must develop yourself to be able to handle the ramifications of a new position and balance all the other factors.”

All I asked of the participants was to take their experiences, new skills and knowledge back to their family, community and workplace with the hope of helping others to grow. That attitude and behavior would be what would get them promoted.

I met this protégé and his wife three years later, and what he said confirmed my intentions. He had become the go-to supervisor, the unofficial mentor of new and old employees; worked at various positions outside of maintenance; had changed his health habits; was more in love than ever (35 years married); and loved life. He was one of many.

This was the same program that caused four employees to leave the company. However, in helping people find themselves, we use a technique championed by Richard Bolles in his book, “What Color is Your Parachute?” Bolles’ approach is based upon finding your God-given gifts (your parachute) and understanding that you will be most satisfied in life if you are using and expanding them.

Through an exhaustive exercise of defining your skills, values, desires, expectations and possible jobs that fit your profile, you are able to evaluate and identify the gifts that you truly have. Gifts are skills and include writing, teaching, coaching, helping, accounting, working with your hands, planning and any of the remaining hundreds.

Next, you will discover where and when you use these most effectively: alone, in small groups, in large companies, inter-group, in startups, in structured environments, in nebulous situations, etc. Then, what types of people do you work best with? What company values do you seek? What location do you prefer geographically? Where is your family in all of this? (They are foremost.)

When you have worked through the exercises to discover these things about yourself, put down on paper the ideal job defined by the above factors. Then, describe how a typical day would go from the time you awoke, walking through the office door, the work day (interactions, using gifts, how you measured accomplishment, etc.), coming home and the evening activities.

So there you have it, a parachute with many colors. You are laying out a vision for your life. Have you thought about doing that? Isn’t it time to do so? Can you help your employees do the same? Maybe give each a copy of the book and workbook and have periodic sessions on finding yourself.

We had four who did so and discovered they were in the wrong company and line of work. I was personally humbled to have had that much effect on them and their families. Each has done very well since. It was a lesson for the company.

Remember, humility overrules pride.

Thursday, 8 September 2016

Achieving Total Productive Maintenance without Supervisors

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/29051/maintenance-without-supervisors

Several years ago I visited a state-of-the-art power plant that had a net generation of 260 megawatts, which is enough electricity to serve 75,000 homes. I was there for an executive meeting of the Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals, which included presentations about this unique plant and its workforce.

It was a green plant in more ways than one. The technology was designed with “green” in mind, and it was a new plant with all of the potential that comes with that. The result was a world-class example of total productive maintenance (TPM).

The opportunity with the most risk was the marriage of maintenance and operations. This was to be a very intense front-end workload with major operating cost impacts. For example, there were 55 craftsmen comprising five 11-person supervisor-less teams on rotating shifts, with the rotated-out team devoted to planning and project type work.

The unique part was that all were experienced craftsmen in performing the required maintenance activities as well as plant operations. There were two managers: a plant manager and a maintenance manager. Every three weeks, corresponding to the shift rotation, they traded places.

During the process of planning for the plant and its operation, management decided to do away with supervisors, planners, maintenance engineers and schedulers. Could not the maintenance/operators perform these activities? Well, yes, if it was laid out and appropriate training was provided to all concerned. It was decided that all of the functions of a world-class operation would be present and active, however resident within each team.

There were approximately 20 people interviewed for each position. Most unsuccessful applicants were uncertain about self-directed teams. After the first employees were selected, they and following hires would make up the interviewing teams. The position requirements included:

  • The employee was a journeyman in a technical craft
  • Had a willingness to work in a team-empowered environment
  • Be cross-trained to be multi-skilled
  • Be trained on and support world-class maintenance principles
  • Be trained and willing to operate the plant equipment
  • Be willing to do whatever the shift required in concert with the other 10 team members.

Work-order planning and within-shift scheduling would come from within the team. Training coincided with the plant construction, taking advantage of the contractors and equipment vendors participating in installations, while simultaneously developing preventive, predictive and corrective maintenance procedures.

Extensive training also covered the soft skills required for self-managed work teams and working in this open environment. All administrative, planning and estimating, preventive and overhaul, operating, performance evaluation, stockroom, and maintenance engineering procedures were developed by the team members with guidance from the two managers, the plant technical staff and company employees from other plants. The 55 craftsmen owned the operation of this generating facility.

A computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) was specified by the teams, and world-class estimating, planning and scheduling were loaded into the system. Preventive maintenance (PM) tasks were assigned to the four shifts, and the rotating teams did not change this basic schedule unless it was agreed across teams. Each team developed expertise within itself for estimating and planning work orders along with analysis of maintenance and operational performance.

Every three weeks, a member from each team would be chosen within the team as a shift representative through whom the other shifts communicated, and the managers would convey pertinent information. After a year, the two managers thought that maybe the representatives should be paid extra for this three-week term. To a man, the 55 craftsmen decided that management should take that additional money and divide it up to increase the hourly rate for all. "This is a team effort."

Over the two years the plant had been in operation, team members all attended additional outside training, some began college programs, and all participated in continuous evaluations of the preventive and predictive maintenance activities. The result was that the plant continued to see continuous improvement, proving that implementation of TPM is possible even without supervisors.

Using Sight Glasses and Level Gauges

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/29202/using-sight-glasses


When I go to a plant to examine its current lubrication practices, among the first things I look for are sight glasses. These devices provide a wealth of information in the time it takes to walk up to a component and check it. More than just simple additions to a machine to indicate there is enough oil in the sump for proper lubrication, sight glasses offer an opportunity to monitor the oil.

Generally, sight glasses come in two styles. Columnar sight glasses attach to an oil-bathed component, typically at the drain port. They have cylinders made of a transparent material (glass, acrylic, some plastics, etc.) in which oil is free to fluctuate up and down with the change of the oil level within the machine. The second style is known as the “bull’s-eye” sight glass. It also is made of a transparent material but is threaded into a port where the oil level should be maintained during operation.

Each sight glass has its own strengths and weaknesses. Columnar sight glasses are great for reading the oil volume. Since it is piped into the machine at a low oil level, the level in a sight glass can usually be seen even when the oil volume is low. The appropriate oil level must be marked on the sight glass so you can tell if it is correct.

Other Types of Oil Level Indicators

There are other oil level indicators that should be mentioned but that don’t necessarily represent best practice for a lubrication program. Dipsticks have been utilized since someone had the great idea to put a metal rod into a volume of oil to check its depth. These devices are easy to use and can tell you where the oil level sits. They also allow you to perform a blotter test with the oil that comes off them.

The problem with dipsticks is that you have to open the machine component to the outside atmosphere to check the oil volume. This gives airborne particles a direct source for ingression. Not only can airborne particles fall in and contaminate the system but also any dirt or debris that may be on the cap when you remove it to pull out the dipstick.

Level plugs are common for machines that hold a smaller amount of oil. These are threaded plugs that are unthreaded from the machine case when the oil is being refilled. Once the oil begins to drip from the oil plug, it has the proper amount of oil in the sump. These are great for refilling purposes, but once again the machine is open to the atmosphere and at risk for particle ingression when these devices are used.

The same goes for systems in which you must open a hatch or cap to visually check the oil volume. Any time you open machine components to the outside, you have to be aware that you are giving dirt and contaminants a chance to enter them. Devices like these should be avoided whenever possible, and equipment modifications should be made to accept either a columnar or bull’s-eye sight glass.


When plumbing in this device, you must make sure there aren’t any “goosenecks” or traps in the piping that would enable the oil level shown in the sight glass not to be representative of the volume in the sump. There are more hardware requirements with these types of gauges due to the fact that they are externally mounted. They also need to be able to “breathe.” Some manufacturers actually put small breathers on top of their products. If possible, it is best to pipe the top of the sight glass either back to the headspace of the reservoir or to a desiccant breather. This allows the sight glass to “breathe” if necessary without ingressing any contaminants.


Another disadvantage of the columnar sight glass is that it doesn’t clearly show whether there is a foam or air entrainment problem on the inside of the reservoir. Since the oil filling the level gauge is coming from the bottom of the sump, air has a chance to detrain, preventing you from being able to see any indication of foam in the column.

On the other hand, a bull’s-eye sight glass sits directly on top of the inside oil level so any foam can be seen more easily. Bull’s-eye sight glasses are great for confirming that the oil level is correct. Since there is no piping or potential to create a trap, whatever level is seen in the bull’s eye is what the oil level actually is.

One drawback to these gauges is that it’s hard to see the true oil color when looking through them. If by chance you have a very clean, unstained sight glass, then you can see the color and be on the lookout for any darkening or changes in turbidity (e.g., from oil/water emulsions).

56%of lubrication professionals use columnar sight glasses most frequently in their plant, according to a recent poll at machinerylubrication.com

It’s not enough just to put a sight glass on a machine and walk away. These devices should be monitored. They are windows into what is happening with your oil and can give you a first-hand account of any problems that are occurring. Things like water contamination, oxidation and low oil levels can all be diagnosed quickly when these accessories are used properly. Being proactive and properly equipping components with a sight glass can provide peace of mind that both the oil and machines are healthy.


About the Author
Wes Cash is a senior technical consultant with Noria Corporation, focusing on machinery lubrication and maintenance in support of Noria's Lubrication Program Development (LPD). He holds a ... 

Wednesday, 7 September 2016

Minimize Waste with a Smooth Work Flow

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:
http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/29030/work-flow-waste

One of the most common performance metrics is planned vs. unplanned work orders. The benchmark goal has been 90 percent planned (preventive maintenance and other planned activities) and 10 percent unplanned corrective/breakdown maintenance. In reality, with most organizations the ratio is anywhere from 10 to 30 percent planned maintenance to 90 to 70 percent unplanned. This is indicative of operating in a reactive mode, which contributes to waste, reduced equipment life and lost productivity.

A thorough understanding and analysis of a maintenance work process flow makes it easier to identify and eliminate waste. The goal is not only to eliminate waste but to develop an improved work process flow that is more effective and productive. As the flow is thoroughly reviewed and analyzed, the entire process flow becomes visible and wasteful activities such as delays, unnecessary travel and the like are easily identified.

Following are some ways to minimize wasteful activities:

Trending

Condition monitoring usually involves the use of installed devices (gauges, meters, etc.) to monitor the operating conditions of equipment and other assets. An example is pressure and temperature readings on a boiler. Maintenance can establish operating limits for the condition(s) being monitored and trend the observed data. If the observed data is outside of a certain predefined range of values, some maintenance action may be required. This is referred to as condition-based maintenance. It can be very effective and less expensive than periodic or fixed frequency maintenance.

Planning and Scheduling

The planner/scheduler’s role is very important in a lean maintenance environment. The goal is to optimize utilization of available resources. Detailed job plans should be developed for all approved open work orders including:

  • The number and type of labor resources (how many plumbers, carpenters, etc.)
  • Time estimates so required manpower can be determined
  • Detailed job steps including permit/safety requirements
  • Parts and tool requirements (pre-kit if possible)
  • Clear job instructions, drawings, sketches, etc.
  • Job site walk down to determine the most efficient way of doing the job
  • Equipment availability coordination
  • Outside contractor requirements (if any)
Delays must be avoided at all cost. Weekly scheduling must be done with daily fine tuning as necessary. This level of detail and coordination is required to achieve a lean and efficient maintenance operation.

About the Author

Kris Bagadia is the president of PEAK Industrial Solutions in Brookfield, Wis. A longtime consultant and educator, he can be reached by e-mail at krisb@peakis.com or viawww.cmmsmadeeasy.com.

Communicate for Successful Transitions

Article extract from ReliablePlant newsletter:

A few years ago, I came to the realization that I needed to improve my engagement with team members and colleagues. One of the things I decided to change was to push myself deeper into the details of the multitude of ongoing projects. I realized there was so much going on that I was having trouble providing enough attention to the details involved in each project. I was only brought in and sought after if there was a problem or a tough decision needed to be made.

As this little epiphany came into light, I realized that this was not good for me or my team members. So, I set about making it one of my priorities to work on from that point forward (in the name of my own continuous improvement).

However, it also occurred to me at the same time that a change of my level of attention could cause the organization to take a step back and feel a little nervous about what I was doing and why I was doing it. As I pondered this notion, I decided to seek out some advice. I reached out to one of my mentors and explained to him the dilemma that I was facing and asked for his counsel in how I should proceed.

His first question was, “How do you think your people will feel about this change?” As I explained that I thought they might feel a little unnerved or concerned about why I was changing this approach, he nodded in understanding. He asked me a few more questions, and we briefly discussed the problem. Then he said, “Beau, how would you feel if your boss changed his behavior like this?” I explained that I think I would feel much like my people are going to feel about it. He agreed, and then asked me what would make me feel better about it?

The light bulb that went off in my head was blinding. I needed to communicate to my team members what I was going to do, what it meant and why I was going to do it. The answer was there, but I just didn’t see it right away.

So, I prepared myself for a team meeting to share with them my plans, my reasoning and what it meant for them. The meeting went great, the people were receptive and they were then eager to share with me the details I was seeking. As this change progressed, I became better at coaching, and the open and honest dialogue helped them feel at ease, maybe even a little excited about it. It went better than I had expected.

My learning from this process was two-fold. First, it really helped to talk with someone about the problem I was facing in order to seek input and advice. If you have someone to turn to whom you respect, seek him or her out to compare notes and do it frequently.

Next, if you are changing the way you do something, explain it before you change it. The open dialogue will get your colleagues on your side and allow them to help you make a successful transition.